The CSCD method: A systematic innovation framework for cultural–technical contradictions—development and validation through culturally constrained content design
Systematic innovation methods resolve technical contradictions effectively but lack procedures for cultural–technical contradictions, in which scientifically accurate information conflicts with cultural taboos. Such contradictions pervade sensitive domains, including sexuality education, mental health, and death education, where feasibility depends on both scientific integrity and social acceptance. Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving (TRIZ) addresses physical contradictions but cannot operationalize cultural constraints, while participatory design lacks algorithmic protocols for conflicting stakeholder standards. This study develops the culturally constrained sensitive content design (CSCD) method, a five-module framework with formalized decision protocols that operationalizes cultural adaptation through tiered content architecture, metaphor-based narratives, de-realization techniques, and multi-stakeholder validation. The framework was validated through interviews with 20 children and a 7-expert focus group, using sex education comics in southern China as an extreme-constraint case. The CSCD method offers the first algorithmic framework for cultural–technical contradictions, with structural analogies suggesting transferability to mental health, death, and financial literacy education pending future empirical validation. It provides replicable procedures for materials that require both scientific accuracy and cultural acceptance, operationalizes cultural adaptation into designable parameters, and indicates potential transferability to other sensitive domains requiring multi-stakeholder validation.
Altshuller, G. (1999). The innovation algorithm: TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity. Technical Innovation Center.
Boer, S. (2020). ‘Maybe I’ll make something with it’: Comics as alternative sex education. Studies in Comics, 11(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1386/stic_00016_1
Bramlett, F., Cook, R., & Meskin, A. (2016). The Routledge companion to comics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315851334
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chen, W. (2022). Xing jiaoyu zhong guojia, fumu, ertong de xianfa guanxi——yi xing jiaoyu duben zhengyi wei li [The constitutional relationship between the state, parents, and children in sexuality education: A case study of controversies over sexuality education textbooks]. Constitutional Law Journal, (1), 123–135. [In Chinese]
China Children’s Culture and Art Foundation, & Beijing Zhongyi Public Welfare Foundation. (2022). “Child protection” 2021 statistics on cases of child sexual abuse and survey report on children’s sexual abuse prevention education. Accessed June 8, 2024. https://all-in-one.org.cn/newsinfo/2475704.html
China National Children’s Center. (2023). Analysis of the difficulties in implementing family sex education and policy recommendations. Beijing, China: CNCC Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Czerwiec, M., Williams, I., Squier, S. M., Green, M. J., Myers, K. R., & Smith, S. T. (2020). Graphic medicine manifesto. Penn State Press.
Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., Candi, M., Bianchi, M., Calabretta, G., Stigliani, I., & Verganti, R. (2025). Design thinking in action: A quantitative study of design thinking practices in innovation projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 29(11), 32–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2024-0424
Faria, C., Valente, B., & Torres, J. (2024). Potentialities of science comics for science communication: Lessons from the classroom. Journal of Science Communication, 23(8), N02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23080802
Farinella, M. (2018). The potential of comics in science communication. Journal of Science Communication, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.17010401
Figueiredo, S. (2011). Building worlds for an interactive experience: Selecting, organizing, and showing worlds of information through comics. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674686
Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (2005). Health program planning: An educational and ecological approach (4th ed.). McGraw- Hill.
Gupta, A., & Paul, T. (2014). Menstrupedia comic: The friendly guide to periods for girls. Menstrupedia.
Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1/2), 46–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40396953
Iqbal, M. S., & Rahman, Z. A. (2025). Accelerating high-value innovation with TRIZ patent literature review: Validation study for shape-memory polymers and smart materials. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 100(12), 2504–2511. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7871
Jacquerye, A., & De Sutter, P. (2023). Sexual education, what challenges for tomorrow? In R. Sterling (Ed.), Sexual education around the world – Past, present and future issues (pp. 27–60). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001975
Ji, Y., & Reiss, M. J. (2022). Cherish lives? Progress and compromise in sexuality education textbooks produced in contemporary China. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 22(4), 496–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2021.1955670
Kremer, N. T. (2017). The comic core: A theory of teaching sequential art narratives (Doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri-Columbia.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Li, J., Li, Y., & Liu, W. (2022). An analysis of parents’ sexual education knowledge, attitudes, and the status of family sex education. Journal of Family Education in China, 3(2), 45–53.
Luz, P. K., Galindo Neto, N. M., Machado, R. S., Marques, M. C., Santos, A. M., & Andrade, E. M. (2023). Construction and validity of educational technology for adolescents on cardiac resuscitation. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, 36, eAPE016932. https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023AO0169332
Mayer, S., Roth, A., & Wollersheim, J. (2025). The impact of design thinking and its underlying theoretical mechanisms: A review of the literature. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(1), 78–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12626
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. HarperPerennial.
Mejia-Duque, J. G., & Guerrero-Alvarado, A. (2025). A TRIZ-based algorithm for business model innovation in manufacturing SMEs: A systematic framework for strategic innovation integrated with the business model canvas. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2542427
Miller, S., & Bley, L. (2013). Not your mother’s meatloaf: A sex education comic book. Soft Skull Press.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2008). Guidelines for health education in primary and secondary schools.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2021). Guidelines for the implementation of sex education in primary and secondary schools. Beijing, China: Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.
National People’s Congress of China. (2020). Minor Protection Law.
Nojima, N. (2022). My body is changing (W. Zhang, Trans.). Sichuan Literature and Art Publishing House. (Original work published 2018)
Preston, J., & Thomassen, A. (2010). Writing through design, an active practice. Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, 3(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp.3.1.45_1
Rösch, N., Tiberius, V., & Kraus, S. (2023). Design thinking for innovation: Context factors, process, and outcomes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0164
Shimizu, A. (2015). Cells at Work! (Vol. 1). Kodansha.
Sorcar, P. (2009). Teaching taboo topics without talking about them: An epistemic study of a new approach to HIV/AIDS prevention education in India. Doctoral dissertation. Stanford University.
Sorcar, P., Strauber, B., Loyalka, P., Kumar, N., & Goldman, S. (2017). Sidestepping the elephant in the classroom: Using culturally localized technology to teach around taboos. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2792–2804). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025958
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. (2017). Online focus groups. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252288
Sutton, J. (2019, February 7). 50 comics about science from a non-scientist. Bored Panda. Accessed June 8, 2024. https:// www.boredpanda.com/comics-about-science-john-sutton/
Tavares, R., Alemany-Pagès, M., Araújo, S., Cohn, N., Ramalho- Santos, J., & Azul, A. M. (2023). Comics in science and health communication: Insights from mutual collaboration and framing a research practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183118
TeachAids. (n.d.). Prevention begins with me. Retrieved October 15, 2025, from https://teachaids.org/for-hiv-aids/ prevention-begins-with-me/
UNESCO. (2018). International technical guidance on sexuality education: An evidence-informed approach. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/UQRM6395
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). The journey towards comprehensive sexuality education: Global status report. https://www. unesco.org/en/articles/journey-towards-comprehensive-sexuality-education-global-status-report
Wacnik, P., Daly, S. R., & Verma, A. (2025). Participatory design: A systematic review and insights for future practice. Design Science, 11, e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2025.10009
Winarto, W., Khiyarusoleh, U., Ardiyansyah, A., Wilujeng, I., & Sukardiyono. (2018). Pocket book based on comic to improve conceptual understanding of child sex abuse (CSA): A case study of elementary school. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 889–900. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11456a
Wiseman, R., Collver, J., Worth, R., & Watt, C. (2021). Hocus pocus: Using comics to promote skepticism about the paranormal. Journal of Science Communication, 20(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20020204
World Health Organization (WHO). (2023, May 18). Comprehensive sexuality education. https://www. who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/ comprehensive-sexuality-education
Zheng, X., & Chen, G. (2010). Zhongguo qingshaonian shengzhi jiankang ke jixing diaocha jichu shuju baogao [Basic data report of the accessibility survey on reproductive health for Chinese adolescents]. Institute of Population Research, Peking University. [In Chinese]. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-1668.2010.03.001
Zhou, Y. (2024). Unpacking the problems of sex education in Chinese primary and secondary schools and the improvement measures. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 45, 559–566. https://doi.org/10.54097/56qpjg93