AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Online First / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.2026XX_XX(X).026270187
Cite this article
2
Download
23
Views
Related Info Links
More by Authors Links
Journal Browser
Volume | Year
Issue
Search
News and Announcements
View All
ARTICLE

Who bears retirement-preparedness inequality? Concentration-index decomposition and machine-learning attribution by gender

Gulshan Kumar1* ,  Babli Dhiman1
Show Less
1 Department of Commerce and Finance, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab , India
Received: 2 July 2026 | Revised: 1 September 2026 | Accepted: 29 September 2026 | Published online: 12 November 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

Retirement preparedness is a multidimensional asset shaping post-employment well-being, yet its socioeconomic distribution among knowledge workers in developing economies remains undocumented. This paper quantifies and decomposes economic inequality in retirement preparedness among academicians in Indian central universities, comparing male and female faculty to reveal its gendered architecture. A cross-sectional survey of 736 mid- to late-career academicians across 11 central universities supported a 0–10 retirement preparedness index spanning financial, psychological, health, social, and lifestyle domains. Generalized linear models estimated determinants within a five-level socio-behavioral framework. Inequality was measured using concentration curves and the concentration index (CI) and decomposed by the Wagstaff method. An interpretable gradient-boosting model with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was added as a specification diagnostic; predictive SHAP importance and Wagstaff contributions are treated as conceptually distinct quantities. Preparedness was pro-rich for both sexes, with greater inequality among women (CI = 0.1156) than men (CI = 0.0742), and among defined-contribution National Pension System members (CI = 0.1283) than defined-benefit Old Pension Scheme members (CI = 0.0611). Household income and financial literacy together explained more than 40% of inequality in each group; spousal employment and financial self-efficacy were distinctive contributors among women, and risk tolerance among men, while outstanding debt and dependency burden were equalizing. The learning layer located where the decomposition’s additive-linear assumption is weakest, recovered a literacy threshold and income saturation, and identified four preparedness archetypes, with women over-represented in the two least-prepared. This is the first concentration-index decomposition of retirement preparedness among Indian academicians to apply an explicit gender lens, identifying behavioral and institutional leverage points for equitable healthy aging. Methodologically, it formalizes a rank-weighted SHAP decomposition as the quantity that would render explainable artificial intelligence attribution commensurable with Wagstaff contributions, and identifies its estimation as the framework’s principal extension.

Keywords
Retirement preparedness
Concentration index
Wagstaff decomposition
Financial literacy
Gender divide
Indian academicians
Artificial intelligence-driven innovation
Explainable machine learning
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no competing financial or non-financial interests. Both authors have neither a financial nor a non-financial relationship with any digital financial-services provider, robo-advisory platform, or asset-management company mentioned in the manuscript.
References

Adams, G. A., & Rau, B. L. (2011). Putting off tomorrow to do what you want today: Planning for retirement. American Psychologist, 66(3), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022131

 

Agarwal, S., Amromin, G., Ben-David, I., Chomsisengphet, S., & Evanoff, D. D. (2015). Financial literacy and financial planning: Evidence from India. Journal of Housing Economics, 27, 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2015.02.003

 

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

 

Asher, M. G., & Bali, A. S. (2015). Public pension programs in Southeast Asia: An assessment. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12100

 

Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2019). Machine learning methods that economists should know about. Annual Review of Economics, 11(1), 685–725. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433

 

Banks, J., & Oldfield, Z. (2007). Understanding pensions: Cognitive function, numerical ability and retirement saving. Fiscal Studies, 28(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00052.x

 

Bhushan, P., & Medury, Y. (2014). An empirical analysis of inter linkages between financial attitudes, financial behaviour and financial knowledge of salaried individuals. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 5(3), 58–64. https://ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/article/view/380

 

Brown, S., & Taylor, K. (2016). Early influences on saving behaviour: Analysis of British panel data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 62, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.09.011

 

Bucher-Koenen, T., Lusardi, A., Alessie, R., & van Rooij, M. (2017). How financially literate are women? An overview and new insights. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12121

 

Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

 

Clark, R. L., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2017). Financial knowledge and 401(k) investment performance: A case study. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 16(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747215000384

 

Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (2021). The Dahlgren-Whitehead model of health determinants: 30 years on and still chasing rainbows. Public Health, 199, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.009

 

Dalstra, J. A. A., Kunst, A. E., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2006). A comparative appraisal of the relationship of education, income and housing tenure with less than good health among the elderly in Europe. Social Science & Medicine, 62(8), 2046–2060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.09.001

 

DiPrete, T. A., & Eirich, G. M. (2006). Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: A review of theoretical and empirical developments. Annual Review of Sociology, 32(1), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123127

 

Erreygers, G. (2009). Correcting the concentration index. Journal of Health Economics, 28(2), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.003

 

Fonseca, R., Mullen, K. J., Zamarro, G., & Zissimopoulos, J. (2012). What explains the gender gap in financial literacy? The role of household decision making. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2011.01221.x

 

Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214502760047131

 

Goyal, K., & Kumar, S. (2021). Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(1), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12605

 

Hershey, D. A., Henkens, K., & van Dalen, H. P. (2010). Aging and financial planning for retirement: Interdisciplinary influences viewed through a cross-cultural lens. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 70(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.70.1.a

 

Hira, T. K., Rock, W. L., & Loibl, C. (2009). Determinants of retirement planning behaviour and differences by age. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(3), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00742.x

 

Kakwani, N., Wagstaff, A., & van Doorslaer, E. (1997). Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics, 77(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01807-6

 

Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(Extra Issue), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626958

 

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 30, pp. 4765–4774). Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY.

 

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2008). Planning and financial literacy: How do women fare? American Economic Review, 98(2), 413–417. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.2.413

 

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5

 

Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543

 

Mahdzan, N. S., Zainudin, R., Sukor, M. E. A., Zainir, F., & Wan Ahmad, W. M. (2019). Determinants of subjective financial well-being across three different household income groups in Malaysia. Social Indicators Research, 146(3), 699–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02138-4

 

Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning: A guide for making black box models explainable (2nd ed.). https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/

 

Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87

 

Niu, G., Zhou, Y., & Gan, H. (2020). Financial literacy and retirement preparation in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 59, Article 101262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101262

 

O'Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E., Wagstaff, A., & Lindelow, M. (2008). Analyzing health equity using household survey data: A guide to techniques and their implementation. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6933-3

 

Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority. (2023). Annual report 2022–23. https://pfrda.org.in/documents/33652/146225/Annual+Reports+22-23+-+English.pdf

 

Sane, R., & Thomas, S. (2015). In search of inclusion: Informal sector participation in a voluntary, defined contribution pension system. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(10), 1409–1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.997220

 

Sekita, S. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Japan. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(4), 637–656. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747211000527

 

Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save More Tomorrow™: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S164–S187. https://doi.org/10.1086/380085

 

Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1086/260971

 

Tomar, S., Baker, H. K., Kumar, S., & Hoffmann, A. O. I. (2021). Psychological determinants of retirement financial planning behavior. Journal of Business Research, 133, 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.007

 

Topa, G., Lunceford, G., & Boyatzis, R. E. (2018). Financial planning for retirement: A psychosocial perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02338

 

United Nations Population Fund. (2023). India ageing report 2023: Caring for our elders—Institutional responses. UNFPA India, New Delhi, India. https://india.unfpa.org/en/publications/caring-our-elders-institutional-responses-india-ageing-report-2023

 

van Rooij, M. C. J., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. J. M. (2012). Financial literacy, retirement planning and household wealth. The Economic Journal, 122(560), 449–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02501.x

 

Wagstaff, A. (2005). The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Economics, 14(4), 429–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.953

 

Yeh, T.-m., & Ling, Y. (2022). Confidence in financial literacy, stock market participation, and retirement planning. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 43(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-021-09769-1

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing