AccScience Publishing / IJOSI / Online First / DOI: 10.6977/IJoSI.202606_10(4).026170065
ARTICLE

The exploratory role of ChatGPT in enhancing the writing performance of architecture foundation students

Turgay Kucuk1†* Mustafa Bingol1†
Show Less
1 English Language Teaching Department, Tishk International University, Erbil-KRI, Iraq
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 20 April 2026 | Revised: 2 June 2026 | Accepted: 24 June 2026 | Published online: 24 July 2026
© 2026 by the Author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution -Noncommercial 4.0 International License (CC-by the license) ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ )
Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence has transformed English language education by providing learners with immediate writing support and feedback. However, empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing, particularly in under-researched contexts such as Iraq, remains limited. The study aims to investigate the effects of ChatGPT-supported writing instruction on students’ writing performance and perceptions. A mixed-methods design was used in our study. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-tests, and qualitative data were collected through a 10-question Google Forms questionnaire to gather opinions from 25 architecture foundation students studying at an international private university in Iraq during the 2025–2026 academic year. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the questionnaire’s consistency. The findings showed that 70% of the students developed a positive attitude toward using ChatGPT. Significant improvements were observed in students’ writing skills, particularly in the areas of idea generation, word choice, and grammatical accuracy. Another encouraging point was that more than 75% of the participating students experienced lower anxiety and increased self-confidence during writing activities. In conclusion, ChatGPT can be used as an effective support tool in English as a foreign language writing instruction. The only point to consider is that the pedagogical framework of this integration should be clearly defined and implemented under teacher guidance. This study is significant because it contributes to research on the effects of ChatGPT on writing in Iraq, given the limited number of studies already conducted.

Keywords
Architecture students
Artificial intelligence in education
ChatGPT
English as a foreign language writing
Human–artificial intelligence collaboration
Student perceptions
Writing performance
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References

Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers' perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218

 

Alharbi, W. (2023). AI in the foreign language classroom: A pedagogical overview of automated writing assistance tools. Education Research International, 2023, 4253331. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4253331

 

Alm, A., & Watanabe, Y. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT in language education: A Freirean perspective. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(3), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121404

 

Almustafa, A. (2025). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on enhancing academic writing skills among university students: A field study at the University of Baghdad. Journal of Education for the Humanities, 5(20), 1253–1272. https://doi.org/10.33899/jeh.2025.189804

 

Alsaedi, N. (2024). ChatGPT and EFL/ESL writing: A systematic review of advantages and challenges. English Language Teaching, 17(5), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v17n5p41

 

Baskara, F. R. (2023). Integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing instruction: Benefits and challenges. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.858

 

Chaqmaqchee, A. L. O., & Naithel, L. D. O. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in English language education in Iraq: A review study of interventions and perceptions. Wasit Journal for Humanities Sciences, 21(3), 1124–1147. https://doi.org/10.31185/wjfh.Vol21.Iss3.1019

 

Dos, I. (2025). A systematic review of research on ChatGPT in higher education. European Educational Researcher, 8(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.824

 

Dwivedi, Y. K., Pandey, N., Currie, W., & Micu, A. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications in the hospitality and tourism industry: Practices, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2023-0686

 

Egera, Q. L., Latiada, A. G., Lozano, L., & Bacatan, J. (2025). The effectiveness of ChatGPT in enhancing academic writing skills of Grade 11 students. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(4). https://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i4.6253

 

ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926

 

Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about ChatGPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180

 

Guleria, A., Krishan, K., Sharma, V., & Kanchan, T. (2023). ChatGPT: Ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 17(9), 1292–1299. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18738

 

Hamid, H., Zulkifli, K., Naimat, F., Yaacob, N. L. C., & Ng, K. W. (2023). Exploratory study on student perception on the use of chat AI in process-driven problem-based learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 15(12), 1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2023.10.001

 

Han, J., Yoo, H., Kim, Y., Myung, J., Kim, M., Lim, H., ... & Oh, A. (2023). RECIPE: How to integrate ChatGPT into EFL writing education. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 416–420). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3596200

 

Harunasari, S. Y. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of AI-integrated approach in EFL writing: A case of ChatGPT. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 39(2), 357. https://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v39.2.5516

 

Jassim, A. (2025). The impact of using ChatGPT and Grammarly on developing Iraqi EFL university students' academic essay writing. Journal of Misan Researches, 21(41), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.52834/jmr.v21i41.286

 

Jung, J., Joo, S., Park, H., & Han, I. (2026). Challenges of integrating ChatGPT into EFL writing: An Activity Theory framework. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2617386

 

Kalla, D., & Smith, N. (2023). Study and analysis of ChatGPT and its impact on different fields of study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(3), 827–833. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7767675

 

Kara, S., & Kucuk, T. (2023). The effects of picture dictionaries in promoting vocabulary development of EFL learners at tertiary level. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 17(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10015826

 

Karthikeyan, C. (2023). Literature review on pros and cons of ChatGPT implications in education. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(3), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR23219122412

 

Khampusaen, D. (2025). The impact of ChatGPT on academic writing skills and knowledge: An investigation of its use in argumentative essays. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(1), 963–988. https://doi.org/10.70730/PGCQ9242

 

Kucuk, T. (2023a). Factors leading to writing anxiety in EFL classes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i1p1

 

Kucuk, T. (2023b). Technology integrated teaching and its positive and negative impacts on education. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i1p46

 

Kucuk, T. (2024). ChatGPT integrated grammar teaching and learning in EFL classes: A study on Tishk International University students in Erbil, Iraq. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on ChatGPT, 100–111. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.6

 

Kucuk, T., Celik, B., & Bingol, M. (2025). Exploring English as a foreign language teachers' perceptions of ChatGPT integration in language teaching. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 13(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v13i1p4

 

Kucuk, T., & Daskan, A. (2024). Mobile assisted language learning (MALL) in vocabulary: A study on Tishk Language Preparatory School students. Arab World English Journal, 15(4), 255–266. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no4.16

 

Lee, H. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, T. T. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review of current landscape, limitations and future directions through general system theory lens. European Journal of Education, 60(4), e70262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70262

 

Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education, 12(1), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072

 

Lo, C. K., Yu, P. L. H., Xu, S., Ng, D. T. K., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2024). Exploring the application of ChatGPT in ESL/EFL education and related research issues: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00342-5

 

Ma, Q., Crosthwaite, P., Sun, D., & Zou, D. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT literacy in language education: A global perspective and comprehensive approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100278

 

Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students' academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

 

Mekheimer, M. (2026). Adoption and perceptions of ChatGPT in an EFL classroom: A mixed-methods study at an Egyptian university. Discover Education, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00992-8

 

Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600–3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_718_23

 

Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., Molla, A., & Asmare, M. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review on opportunities, challenges and future directions. Algorithms, 18(6), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060352

 

Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M. T., & Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT integration in higher education for personalized learning, academic writing, and coding tasks: A systematic review. Computers, 14(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020053

 

Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? Comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method research, their applications, types, and limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.30564/jmser.v5i1.4538

 

Tarchi, C., Zappoli, A., Casado Ledesma, L., & Brante, E. W. (2025). The use of ChatGPT in source-based writing tasks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(2), 858–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00413-1

 

Teng, M. F. (2024). "ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies": EFL learners' perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

 

Teng, M. F., & Huang, J. (2025). Incorporating ChatGPT for EFL writing and its effects on writing engagement. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.367874

 

Triantafyllou, S. A. (2025). Understanding AI and Google's broader efforts in AI. In Y. Farhaoui, T. Herawan, A. L. Imoize, A. E. Allaoui (Eds.), Intersection of artificial intelligence, data science, and cutting-edge technologies: From concepts to applications in smart environment (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 1353). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88304-0_10

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (Vol. 2). Springer Science & Business Media.

 

Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students' learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y

 

Yucedal, H. M., Abdulrahman, S. A., & Kara, S. (2022). Process-genre approach in teaching writing to language preparatory school students at a private university in Iraq. Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies, 2(5), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i5.64

 

Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT for next generation science learning. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 29(3), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589649

Share
Back to top
International Journal of Systematic Innovation, Electronic ISSN: 2077-8767 Print ISSN: 2077-7973, Published by AccScience Publishing