A Mayan calendar-inspired cyclical TRIZ approach: Enhancing systematic innovation and long-term problem-solving
This paper introduces the Mayan calendar-inspired cyclical theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ) model, an innovative approach to systematic innovation (SI) that integrates the seven TRIZ pillars into a structured model consisting of “Tzolk’in” (short-term, adaptation), “Haab” (mid-term, harmonization), and “Long Count” (long-term, transformation) cycles. Unlike traditional linear innovation models, this cyclical model enables continuous adaptation, iterative refinement, and sustainable evolution. Each cycle addresses a different level of complexity: The adaptation cycle focuses on rapid, low-cost improvements using available resources. The harmonization cycle resolves deep-rooted contradictions to enhance system functionality. The transformation cycle drives strategic evolution by integrating intelligence and automation. This approach is validated through its alignment with trends of engineering system evolution, demonstrating that innovation naturally progresses through these phases. The model’s practical applicability is illustrated through case studies on coffee machine design and automotive seat design, showing how short-term enhancements, mid-term optimization, and long-term transformation collectively contribute to sustainable evolution. By bridging systematic problem-solving with iterative adaptation, the cyclical TRIZ model provides a versatile and scalable SI model for industries seeking to achieve both immediate efficiency gains and long-term innovation resilience.
Brandenburg, F. (2002). Methodology for Planning to Technological Product Innovation. Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
Cavallucci, D., Fuhlhaber, S., & Riwan, A. (2015). Assisting decisions in inventive design of complex engineering systems. Procedia Engineering, 131, 935–983.
Chanier, T. (2018). A possible solution to the mayan calendar enigma. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 40, 18–25.
Ghane, M., Ang, M.C., Cavallucci, D., Kadir, R.A., Ng, K.W., & Sorooshian, S. (2022). TRIZ trend of engineering system evolution: A review on applications, benefits, challenges and enhancement with computer-aided aspects. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 174, 108833.
Hansen, M.T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The innovation value chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121–130.
Ilevbare, I.M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R. (2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33, 30–37.
Khomenko, N., & Ashtiani, M. (2007). Classical TRIZ and OTSM as a Scientific Theoretical Background for Non-Typical Problem-Solving Instruments. ETRIA Future, Frankfurt.
Khomenko, N., & Kucharavy, D. (2002). OTSM-TRIZ Problem Solving Process: Solutions and their Classification. Proceedings of TRIZ Future Conference. Strasbourg, France.
Kruger, L.L.S.J., Pretorius, J.H.C., & Erasmus, L.D. (2019). Towards a comprehensive systematic innovation model: A literature review. SAIEE Africa Research Journal, 110, 39–46.
Mann, D. (2003). Better technology forecasting using systematic innovation methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70,779–795.
Mann, D. (2007). Hands-on Systematic Innovation. IFR Press, Devon.
Mann, D. (2023). TRIZ and chaos: First principles for emergency first responders. In: Cavallucci, D.,Livotov, P., & Brad, S., editors. Towards AI-Aided Invention and Innovation, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham,p453–464.
Rahim, Z.A., & Iqbal, M.S. (2023). Hydrogen fuel cell technology revolution and intervention using TRIZ S-curve analysis for automotive system innovation. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 46(12), 2590–2599.
Roper, S., Du, J., & Love, J. (2008). Modeling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37(6–7),962–977.
Sheu, D.D., & Chiu, S.C. (2017). Prioritized relevant trend identification for problem solving based on quantitative measures. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 107, 327–344.
Sheu, D.D., & Lee, H.K. (2011). A proposed process for systematic innovation. International Journal of Production Research, 49, 847–868.
Sheu, D.D., Chiu, M.C., & Cayard, D. (2020). The 7 pillars of TRIZ philosophies. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 146, 106572.
Sun, J., Li, H.Y., Du, Y.J., Song, Z., & Tan, R. (2020). A systematic innovation process oriented to inter-discipline. In: Cavallucci, D., Brad, S., & Livotov, P., editors. Systematic Complex Problem Solving in the Age of Digitalization and Open Innovation, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer International Publishing, Cham,p257–267.
Wang, F., Tan, R., Wang, K., Cen, S., & Peng, Q. (2024). Innovative product design based on radical problem solving. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 189, 109941.
Zhan, Y., Tan, K.H., Ji, G., Chung, L., & Tseng, M. (2017). A big data framework for facilitating product innovation processes. Business Process Management Journal, 23, 518–536.
